Although Eskom confirmed that it would not make a profit from the sale of electricity to two ferrochrome producers at a tariff of 62c/kWh, the State-owned company nevertheless argued that the costs associated with forgoing the 12.8 TWh of yearly demand arising from the smelters would be larger and more damaging. Specifically, Eskom said the deal would allow it to avoid a R56-billion “downside risk” associated with take-or-pay coal contracts, while safeguarding R42.5-billion in revenue over the period of the smelter contracts, which also had take-or-pay commitments.